2222af64-7834-4d35-ba0e-afe17ef500f1 22 4 5 false false 1 decimal
&[DATE] &[TIME] - &[FILENAME]
&[PAGENUM] / &[COUNT]
 2 2.38428357756456 2.5937424601 2.67651141089557 2.70481382942153 2.71399626880839 2.71692393223559 2.71785215491505 2.71814592682493 2.7182388498999 2.7182682371923 2.71827753049507 2.71828046909575 2.71828139828385 2.71828169413208 2.7182817870107 2.71828179834736 2.71828173025818 2.71828205201156 2.71828135238901 2.71828205323479 2.71827562672197 2.71828205335711 2.71835197513721 2.71852349603724 2.7179702547011 2.7161100340869 2.71034709242469 2.71611003408702 2.67255079745035 3.03503520654926 4.07281084923965 1 1 34 1 mat 0 2 0.5 2.38428357756456 1 2.5937424601 1.5 2.67651141089557 2 2.70481382942153 2.5 2.71399626880839 3 2.71692393223559 3.5 2.71785215491505 4 2.71814592682493 4.5 2.7182388498999 5 2.7182682371923 5.5 2.71827753049507 6 2.71828046909575 6.5 2.71828139828385 7 2.71828169413208 7.5 2.7182817870107 8 2.71828179834736 8.5 2.71828173025818 9 2.71828205201156 9.5 2.71828135238901 10 2.71828205323479 10.5 2.71827562672197 11 2.71828205335711 11.5 2.71835197513721 12 2.71852349603724 12.5 2.7179702547011 13 2.7161100340869 13.5 2.71034709242469 14 2.71611003408702 14.5 2.67255079745035 15 3.03503520654926 15.5 4.07281084923965 16 1 16.5 1 34 2 mat plot

Euler Number approx
calculation formula

euler 1 1 n / + ( n ^ :

Euler number

e 2.71828182845905

While I was trying to perform Euler number approximation calculation, I have noticed there is an inconsistency if n gets bigger. At some point calculation even gets more drift apart from euler when n gots bigger though it has to gets closer. More interesting calculation gives "1" if n≥16.

Is this a bug or calculation limitation?