e7446905-5212-49c0-a821-c3078c4300c3 26 4 5 decimal
&[DATE] &[TIME] - &[FILENAME]
&[PAGENUM] / &[COUNT]
 <p>Shapes courtesy of Martin Kraska </p>

These are the objects that can be placed in the modeller region to define the model.

Set "Vorlage" as template in the context menu of the modeler region.

The items in the model are identified by template number.

 <p>Input </p>

Input

1=support, 2=hinge. Use hinge for cantilever

MoE

MoI

Uniform Load

On all spans

Partial Loads

Enter wb in top row

This last column is a problem. See NOTE 2 below

Enter b in second row

Enter we in third row

Enter e in bottom row

Point Loads

Temporarily take this script out of function format for easier debugging.

Note 3: May need to reconsider the names of the individual templates i.e. t.cw, t.hinge, etc. Many times t.xxx will be used to define thicknesses and could overwrite this variable??

Note 1: Does hinge support need to be inline with the beam? Or is it ok to be below the beam? Visually maybe it should align but really this is not important. As long as it functions OK. Old code below:

NOTE 2: I need to create a new w.p matrix for "trapazoidial" input. This would create a new matrix of a partial uniform load and a partial triangular load. Or I need to create a new shape and understand how to put this into the preprocessor. Do both need to be positive or both negative???

Note: I show these as nested, but this is not correct. They must be seperated.

NOTE 5: How should the laods and beam be scaled. My first instinct is to have E, I and loads directly input to the preprocesor and therefore scaling of loads and beam does not effect the solution to the problem.

 2 0 0 1.2192 m * 1.2192 m * 2 3.048 m * 0 1.2192 m * 1.2192 m * 4 6.096 m * 1.2192 m * 1.2192 m * 1.2192 m * 2 12.192 m * 0 1.2192 m * 1.2192 m * 1 6.096 m * 1.2192 m * 12.192 m * 1.2192 m * 5 6.096 m * 2.4384 m * 12.192 m * 1.2192 m * 5 1.524 m * 3.6576 m * 3.048 m * 1.2192 m * 6 4.572 m * 3.6576 m * 3.048 m * 1.2192 m * 7 7.62 m * 3.6576 m * 3.048 m * 1.2192 m * 7 10.668 m * 3.6576 m * 3.048 m * 1.2192 m * 10 5 mat

Note: Modeller in = Template, X, Y, W, H

 2 0 0 1.2192 m * 1.2192 m * 2 3.048 m * 0 1.2192 m * 1.2192 m * 4 6.096 m * 1.2192 m * 1.2192 m * 1.2192 m * 2 12.192 m * 0 1.2192 m * 1.2192 m * 1 6.096 m * 1.2192 m * 12.192 m * 1.2192 m * 5 6.096 m * 2.4384 m * 12.192 m * 1.2192 m * 5 1.524 m * 3.6576 m * 3.048 m * 1.2192 m * 6 4.572 m * 3.6576 m * 3.048 m * 1.2192 m * 7 7.62 m * 3.6576 m * 3.048 m * 1.2192 m * 7 10.668 m * 3.6576 m * 3.048 m * 1.2192 m * 10 5 mat out1

Note 4: Maybe the partial loads should stack on top of each other? This is of low importance. Function should be the main goal for now.