Hydraulic calculation of the pipeline - Messages
I just started to study the program on my own.
And I don’t know how to build dependency graphs V(Q), Re(Q), lambda(Q) and delta p1 (Q) (see the file).
Сan you help with advice?
Thanks in advance.
Raschjot gidrolinii.sm (17 KiB) downloaded 33 time(s).
WroteСan you help with advice?
Maybe Colebrook will help to complete your document.
Cheers ... Jean.
Raschjot gidrolinii [incomplete].sm (18 KiB) downloaded 32 time(s).
Inst_Colebrook Pipe Data.sm (71 KiB) downloaded 38 time(s).
I found another mistake.
Everything works now.
Now I'm trying to plot graphs...
Raschjot gidrolinii.sm (1 MiB) downloaded 28 time(s).
Raschjot gidr.sm (40 KiB) downloaded 36 time(s).
WroteChanged the code a little and built a variant of the graphs
Raschjot gidr.sm (40 KiB) downloaded 36 time(s).
Your solution is very beautiful
Check Δp ... it looks bizarre.
Inst_Colebrook PipeLine [unk].sm (19 KiB) downloaded 33 time(s).
WroteI saved in my personal file.
Check Δp ... it looks bizarre.
Inst_Colebrook PipeLine [unk].sm (19 KiB) downloaded 33 time(s).
Thank you, Jean. You're right
I understand.
Because Lambda is calculated using three different formulas.
Interpolation is also needed.
But overall the solution looks right.
Best regards, Tolik
Approximation in this case
WroteThank you, Jean. You're right
I understand.
Because Lambda is calculated using three different formulas.
Interpolation is also needed.
But overall the solution looks right.
Best regards, Tolik
Nothing wrong to adapt third segment for a smooth junction,
or simply ignore for elongating 2nd segment.
Take care ... Jean.
Inst_Colebrook PipeLine [unk].sm (24 KiB) downloaded 41 time(s).
WroteThank you, Jean. You're right
I understand.
Because Lambda is calculated using three different formulas.
Interpolation is also needed.
But overall the solution looks right.
Best regards, Tolik
I think you should initialize λ1:=64
Δp interpolation is straightforward as given.
λ interpolation will surely need Thiele.
Please, let me know if you want λ interpolation.
Have a good day Kamarad ... Jean.
WroteI think you should initialize λ1:=64
Îp interpolation is straightforward as given.
λinterpolation will surely need Thiele.
Please, let me know if you want λ interpolation.
Have a good day Kamarad ... Jean.
All your data sets have been converted to scalar functions.
Thiele is exceptional for Lambda.
By observation, Delta P needs better adjusting
segment 1 and segment 2 ... refine 2/3 junction.
All that done, it remains specific as demo, is it ?
Cheers ... Jean.
Inst_Colebrook PipeLine [unk].sm (266 KiB) downloaded 27 time(s).
Have a good visit ... Jean.
Inst_Colebrook PipeLine [unk].sm (267 KiB) downloaded 32 time(s).
You did a great job in my opinion.
In fact, the pressure will undergo two transitions.
The first transition: the destruction of the laminar flow and the appearance of the first large vortices.
The second transition: the core of the flow begins to touch the tops of the roughness of the pipe walls.
But I don't know exactly how they will affect the graph..
Yes, at this stage I needed to get a rough solution.
This is only the first section of the calculation of the system.
There are four of them.
Moreover, at the end, the pipeline has a branch. As a result, the solution is expected to be quite long.
Best regards, Tolik
WroteMoreover, at the end, the pipeline has a branch. As a result, the solution is expected to be quite long.
Best regards, Tolik
Perpendicular branches create singular losses.
Better conserve this refreshed version.
Nice project ... Jean.
Inst_Colebrook PipeLine [unk].sm (88 KiB) downloaded 41 time(s).
-
New Posts
-
No New Posts