1 Pages (7 items)
FindRoot vs. solve(2) or (4) - Fundamental understanding of both functions - Messages
#1 Posted: 4/12/2018 2:12:23 PM
Having an issue understanding where to use what ...
FindRoot vs solve(4).sm (4 KiB) downloaded 33 time(s).
FindRoot vs solve(4).sm (4 KiB) downloaded 33 time(s).
#2 Posted: 4/12/2018 2:37:10 PM
FindRoot needs an initial guess to be explicited, therefore as 2nd argument use 1 or whatever number is more appropriate.
If you like my plugins please consider to support the program buying a license; for personal contributions to me: paypal.me/dcprojects
#3 Posted: 4/12/2018 2:54:19 PM
Thank you Davide,
Can you post how to do the initial guess? I've tried multiple items with no success
Can you post how to do the initial guess? I've tried multiple items with no success
#4 Posted: 4/12/2018 3:22:42 PM
WroteThank you Davide,
Can you post how to do the initial guess? I've tried multiple items with no success
Here you have

FindRoot vs solve(4).sm (4 KiB) downloaded 33 time(s).
If you like my plugins please consider to support the program buying a license; for personal contributions to me: paypal.me/dcprojects
1 users liked this post
ElSid 4/12/2018 5:14:00 PM
#5 Posted: 4/12/2018 5:16:08 PM
Davide,
User error! I was initializing with #c instead of #a or #b.
User error! I was initializing with #c instead of #a or #b.

#6 Posted: 4/12/2018 8:30:49 PM
WroteHaving an issue understanding where to use what ...
1. roots is local of utmost accuracy.
2. solve[4] is general on specified range.
... will find/locate all 0's of Bessel in specified range
... roots [individually located] will meet Abramowitz & Stegun
roots and find work around different numerical algorithms.
You must have valid example(s) for Doctoring.
"Samples" is immensely furbished.
Solve roots.sm (16 KiB) downloaded 33 time(s).
#7 Posted: 4/12/2018 9:37:07 PM
1 Pages (7 items)
-
New Posts
-
No New Posts