bug in matrix function involving a double loop

bug in matrix function involving a double loop - Messages

#1 Posted: 3/29/2022 12:52:52 PM
Laurent Fournier

Laurent Fournier

9 likes in 66 posts.

Group: User

Hello, there is a simple turnaround so it's not a big deal, but still... This looks like a bug...
Or is there something I didn't understand?
I like to see the numbers in my engineering calculations, that why I use matrices.
Thanks everyone for your help/advice,
Thank you Andrey for this incredible software.
Regards
Laurent

File not found.File not found.
#2 Posted: 3/29/2022 3:10:10 PM
sergio

sergio

115 likes in 329 posts.

Group: User

It's not really a bug but a smath behavior. If you add an "eval" that forces the numerical evaluation of the nested producer, it works
bug(s).sm (6 KiB) downloaded 27 time(s).
sergio
1 users liked this post
Alvaro Diaz Falconi 3/30/2022 2:23:00 PM
#3 Posted: 3/29/2022 4:00:13 PM
Martin Kraska

Martin Kraska

1222 likes in 2150 posts.

Group: Moderator

I'd still call it a bug. Is there any good reason why definition and display in separate cells behave differently from definition and display in the same cell?

There is no problem with def and display in different cells with the original definition (without eval). You also can use M:eval(sumofproduct(Ma))=

One would expect that the combination a:b=c would store b in a and then display a just as it would be displayed with a= in a subsequent cell.

Obviously this is not the case, either because
- there is a good reason from usage point of view (which I don't know) or
- there is a good reason from development point of view (e.g. too complicated to do it this way) or
- it is just a bug.

The error message "j not defined" is definitely a bug, why would one expect loop variables to require an additional definition.

In case the behaviour is too hard to fix, I would even recommend to remove the feature of display and def in the same cell. I know I was among those who asked for it many years ago but not at the cost of having to weave eval() into the sheet wherever it might help.
Martin Kraska Pre-configured portable distribution of SMath Studio: https://en.smath.info/wiki/SMath%20with%20Plugins.ashx
2 users liked this post
sergio 3/29/2022 4:02:00 PM, Alvaro Diaz Falconi 3/30/2022 2:23:00 PM
#4 Posted: 3/29/2022 4:24:05 PM
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 likes in 6866 posts.

Group: User

Augmented version ... no red SS 6179
If you don't see or have red the 3 blocks,
please let me know for a snippet image.
Cheers ... Jean.

bug 6179.sm (39 KiB) downloaded 24 time(s).
#5 Posted: 3/29/2022 7:11:50 PM
overlord

overlord

547 likes in 1330 posts.

Group: Moderator

Wrote

I'd still call it a bug.


Yes, me too.
sum() and product() creates havoc sometimes.
The bug can be iron out with line() also, but why?
Why we need line() or eval() or symbolic/numeric to resolve these kind of issues?
sum() and product() used functions can't solve() or roots() too.

2022-03-30_01-01.png

otherbugs.png
#6 Posted: 3/30/2022 8:09:09 AM
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 likes in 6866 posts.

Group: User

Wrote

no red SS 6179



sumofproduct.PNG

  • New Posts New Posts
  • No New Posts No New Posts