Hi,

This is a piece of a script to draw a IPE/HE beam cross section; the idea is to draw the section using the double symmetry of the profile, rather than do it point by point, but I've found some problems/incongruences... I think can be bugs, but I'm not sure...

stack reverse problems.zip

bugs%2fstack%20reverse%2001.png

regards, w3b5urf3r

Hello w3b5urf3r,

I mentioned that in some other post reverse-and-interpolation

The problem could be resolved if you use Numerical optimization for the variables defined with reverse(). Just use it for your Q and S variables and everything will be fine.

Regards,
Radovan

Wrote

Hello w3b5urf3r,

I mentioned that in some other post reverse-and-interpolation

The problem could be resolved if you use Numerical optimization for the variables defined with reverse(). Just use it for your Q and S variables and everything will be fine.

Regards,
Radovan

done, thank you!

P.S. this problem can't be resolved inside functions (see the end of updated stack reverse problems.zip)

Wrote

Wrote

Hello w3b5urf3r,

I mentioned that in some other post reverse-and-interpolation

The problem could be resolved if you use Numerical optimization for the variables defined with reverse(). Just use it for your Q and S variables and everything will be fine.

Regards,
Radovan

done, thank you!

P.S. this problem can't be resolved inside functions (see the end of updated stack reverse problems.zip)

Actually, it can. Inside your function use eval(reverse(...)) instead reverse(...).

Regards,
Radovan