1 Pages (5 items)
sum over range is terribly slow - Messages
#1 Posted: 3/28/2018 4:48:19 AM
debug.sm (12 KiB) downloaded 34 time(s).
While doing a sum on a floating-point range I have realized simple SUM(4) cannot be directly used
It requires translation of FP range into the integer range, which is basically a hack.
Doing a sum over the FP range in a loop is terribly slow - any ideas why?

While doing a sum on a floating-point range I have realized simple SUM(4) cannot be directly used
It requires translation of FP range into the integer range, which is basically a hack.
Doing a sum over the FP range in a loop is terribly slow - any ideas why?
#2 Posted: 3/28/2018 5:04:43 AM
Use Optimization --> Numeric on the function.
(R/Click on the function, select Optimization ---> Numeric.
(R/Click on the function, select Optimization ---> Numeric.
Look within!... The secret is inside you.
Best Regards
Eng. NDTM Amarasekera - Sri Lanka
#3 Posted: 3/28/2018 5:38:37 AM
WroteUse Optimization --> Numeric on the function.
(R/Click on the function, select Optimization ---> Numeric.
That worked. Thanks!
#4 Posted: 3/28/2018 9:28:35 AM
WroteDoing a sum over the FP range in a loop is terribly slow - any ideas why?
I don't see that here. "for loop" is always the winner. deeper @ kernel level.
debug [doctored].sm (12 KiB) downloaded 36 time(s).
#5 Posted: 3/29/2018 9:30:19 AM
WroteWroteDoing a sum over the FP range in a loop is terribly slow - any ideas why?
I don't see that here. "for loop" is always the winner. deeper @ kernel level.
debug [doctored].sm (12 KiB) downloaded 36 time(s).
AS NTDMA has suggested, Numeric Optimization did the trick. Its was purely to do with my incompetence.
1 Pages (5 items)
-
New Posts
-
No New Posts