Vlookup Delay

Vlookup Delay - Сообщения

#1 Опубликовано: 18.02.2018 12:15:39
NDTM Amarasekera

NDTM Amarasekera

130 сообщений из 352 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

An automatic electronic device had been installed on the bank of a stream to record and transmit Water Levels (at half hour intervals) to a control center, where the readings were converted to discharge values, for further analysis, using an already established Rating Table. These data are given in an Excel file.

The attached SS file takes nearly 2 minutes to convert 1 month data values (48x31=1488).
I have tried this with several previous SS versions also.
Can this be improved, as we have to deal with data recorded for over 5 years?
My system: Win 10 Pro, 64 bit, Core i5, 6 GB Ram Laptop.
Any help will be much appreciated please

WL To Q.sm (18 КиБ) скачан 42 раз(а).
1.July WL&RT.xlsx (29 КиБ) скачан 61 раз(а).

Файл не найден. Файл не найден.
Look within!... The secret is inside you. Best Regards Eng. NDTM Amarasekera - Sri Lanka
#2 Опубликовано: 18.02.2018 15:42:00
Andrey Ivashov

Andrey Ivashov

2270 сообщений из 3734 понравились пользователям.

Группа: Super Administrator

Hello.

First impression is that you should try using findrows(...) function (built in into the program) in this case.

findrows_1.PNG

vlookup(value,table,column):line(findrows(table,value,column-1),1,1)

Before change:
2 min. 14 sec.

After change:
2.4 sec.

But I see different results of using vlookup implemented in your worksheet (returns 1488 rows vector) and findrows (returns 2976 rows vector). Unfortunately I have no chance to deep into the logic, but this may be a good starting point.

Best regards.
#3 Опубликовано: 18.02.2018 16:23:08
Andrey Ivashov

Andrey Ivashov

2270 сообщений из 3734 понравились пользователям.

Группа: Super Administrator

Did find 5 minutes more to look into it and finally I did it:

WL To Q_mod1.sm (16 КиБ) скачан 62 раз(а).
Takes 1.7 sec. on my environment.

Best regards.
#4 Опубликовано: 18.02.2018 17:19:13
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 сообщений из 6866 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

Wrote

First impression is that you should try using findrows(...) function (built in into the program) in this case.



Maybe the other way around => vlookup needs be doctored.
Mine works fine 0.06 s scanning 9 rows for one value
FindRows => 2.4 s scanning 31 rows ... for ONE value, is it ?

Utilities Matrix lookup.sm (11 КиБ) скачан 58 раз(а).

#5 Опубликовано: 18.02.2018 23:16:33
NDTM Amarasekera

NDTM Amarasekera

130 сообщений из 352 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

Wrote

Did find 5 minutes more to look into it and finally I did it:

  • Новые сообщения Новые сообщения
  • Нет новых сообщений Нет новых сообщений