1 страниц (7 вхождений)
solver, function with "for loop" not working - solver error - Сообщения
Hi all, trying to get "solve" to work with a function that has a "for loop"
The crux of the issue is this part. Is what I'm doing just not possible?

File attached
upload-question1.sm (18 КиБ) скачан 134 раз(а).
The crux of the issue is this part. Is what I'm doing just not possible?

File attached
upload-question1.sm (18 КиБ) скачан 134 раз(а).
WroteHi all, trying to get "solve" to work with a function that has a "for loop"
The crux of the issue is this part. Is what I'm doing just not possible?
Plot that function first, then solve.
That will clarify the suite.
upload-question1 Solve.sm (22 КиБ) скачан 135 раз(а).
Thanks for the attempt to help Jean, but I surmise from your answer that the particular construct I'm using, which involves a "sign" function, can't be solved using the "solve" function.
As shown in the attachment, the function does have a root.
As shown in the attachment, the function does have a root.
WroteThanks for the attempt to help Jean, but I surmise from your answer that the particular construct I'm using, which involves a "sign" function, can't be solved using the "solve" function.
I was suggesting a solve bloc within a for loop, your original question.
Cheers ... Jean
WroteThanks for the attempt to help Jean, but I surmise from your answer that the particular construct I'm using, which involves a "sign" function, can't be solved using the "solve" function.
As shown in the attachment, the function does have a root.
Sign isn't one of the problematic functions for solve (maybe for diff or int, but not for solve). Here is the problem: Mathcad have an special notation for the imaginary unit as 1i or 1j, SMath doesn't. Just change "i" by "n" under your Sigma:

Best regards.
Alvaro.
Raznor - thanks for that! Appreciated.
I managed to solve it a slightly different way - rather than using the explicit summation form, I replaced it with a sum() call. So I didn't need to explicitly define the counter.
I have to stop trying to program like it's VBA

I managed to solve it a slightly different way - rather than using the explicit summation form, I replaced it with a sum() call. So I didn't need to explicitly define the counter.
I have to stop trying to program like it's VBA


1 страниц (7 вхождений)
-
Новые сообщения
-
Нет новых сообщений