solve small numbers

solve small numbers - trying to solve an equation with small number solution - Сообщения

#1 Опубликовано: 01.11.2023 21:42:25
elis02

elis02

0 сообщений из 1 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

test_s_math.sm (9 КиБ) скачан 29 раз(а).

Hi I'm trying to solve an equation (see in the attached file) where the solution , the number should be small but for some reason which i can't understand , the app doesn't provide me a solution.
Why is that?

P.S
I'm new to Smath but it seems like it can help a lot with calculations.
#2 Опубликовано: 01.11.2023 23:59:25
Oscar Campo

Oscar Campo

124 сообщений из 298 понравились пользователям.

Группа: Moderator

Hi Elis02,
Native solve() is nota robust solver, so it's convenient use functions as Solve() from Maxima plugin or FindRoot() from Non Linear Solvers plugin.

You need provide a value to x(t) for asking for a value of t that satisfies the equation, in the form "x(t)=k, t" where k is the value you expect obtain when replace for t:

[albumimg]1697[/albumimg]

Best,
Oscar
#3 Опубликовано: 02.11.2023 00:09:46
overlord

overlord

549 сообщений из 1332 понравились пользователям.

Группа: Moderator

Numeric solvers don't like units.
Either don't use them or add units to solvers.
Entering a range/interval will help for solve().
Findroot() won't need unit addition btw.

Regards

test_s_math_solved.sm (12 КиБ) скачан 29 раз(а).

2023-11-01_20-07.png
2 пользователям понравился этот пост
Oscar Campo 02.11.2023 00:13:00, NDTM Amarasekera 02.11.2023 19:07:00
#4 Опубликовано: 03.11.2023 02:32:22
overlord

overlord

549 сообщений из 1332 понравились пользователям.

Группа: Moderator

Jean has ignored units, manually input E1.
As usual, these made him totally wrong.
He doesn't have correct answer.

This is Jean's plot;
2023-11-02_22-27.png

This what it should be;
2023-11-02_22-26.png

If you don't know, then don't say.
Your mistakes are harming this community.
3 пользователям понравился этот пост
Alvaro Diaz Falconi 03.11.2023 02:50:00, Oscar Campo 03.11.2023 05:24:00, NDTM Amarasekera 03.11.2023 09:00:00
#5 Опубликовано: 03.11.2023 17:09:30
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 сообщений из 6866 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

Windows handles arithmetic [+,-,*,/] in the range 10^ ± 307.
Your ^-19 is so small that the quadratic term vanishes.
What's left is the linear term and the shift system.
On the other hand, some function may be granular.
Granular in the sense that they many not compute exactly.
The one best known from Mathematica.
Jean
#6 Опубликовано: 03.11.2023 18:17:56
overlord

overlord

549 сообщений из 1332 понравились пользователям.

Группа: Moderator

Wrote

Windows handles arithmetic [+,-,*,/] in the range 10^ ± 307.
Your ^-19 is so small that the quadratic term vanishes.


No it doesn't vanishes.
You are simply not capable to work with units.
Anything involves physical quantities, you are wrong there.
This is not the first you act like a buffoon.
You couldn't write a simple formula, admit it.
In fact, you are a horribly wretched engineer.

Jean, look and learn. This is how you eliminate units.
Btw, why did you delete all your meaningless replies?

2023-11-03_14-16.png

Can you see the problem Jean?
You forgot your unit conversions.
m_Ar and E1 needs magick numbers in your approach.
If you would capable to work with units, no coefficients needed.
Everything is simple, clean, easier to apprehend, much easier to manipulate with units.
2 пользователям понравился этот пост
Oscar Campo 03.11.2023 23:30:00, Alvaro Diaz Falconi 04.11.2023 00:16:00
  • Новые сообщения Новые сообщения
  • Нет новых сообщений Нет новых сообщений