Issue when functions have in definition and evaluation arguments with same names but different order

Issue when functions have in definition and evaluation arguments with same names but different order - Сообщения

К последнему сообщению

#1 Опубликовано: 18.09.2012 04:24:26

Davide Carpi

1 428 сообщений из 2 886 понравились пользователям.

Группа: Moderator

Hi,

I've found an issue with symbolic evaluation of function (see the attachments)

regards,

w3b5urf3r

If you like my plugins please consider to support the program buying a license; for personal contributions to me: paypal.me/dcprojects

#2 Опубликовано: 18.09.2012 05:40:54

Radovan Omorjan

325 сообщений из 2 052 понравились и 1 не понравились пользователям.

Группа: Moderator

Hello w3b5urf3r,

I am not quite sure if this should work this way. Look at the picture please. It seems it is connected to the possibility of changing the function arguments and not to the lowercase or uppercase letters. On the other hand, something like this is not possible neither numerically nor symbolically

[MATH=eng]f(a,b):a+b[/MATH]

[MATH=eng]a:3[/MATH]

[MATH=eng]f(a,a)=#@#[/MATH]

An error:"An item with the same key has already been added" seems to me quite strange and not comprehensible.

Regards,
Radovan

When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"

1 пользователям понравился этот пост

Davide Carpi 20.09.2012 20:40:00

#3 Опубликовано: 20.09.2012 20:36:22

Davide Carpi

1 428 сообщений из 2 886 понравились пользователям.

Группа: Moderator

Hi omorr,

I agree with you, I'll change the Topic title...

The bug with multiple arguments seem related with this issue with strings.

regards,

w3b5urf3r

If you like my plugins please consider to support the program buying a license; for personal contributions to me: paypal.me/dcprojects

Новые сообщения
Нет новых сообщений

Форум SMath

Issue when functions have in definition and evaluation arguments with same names but different order - Сообщения