SMath won't input properly

SMath won't input properly - Сообщения

#1 Опубликовано: 03.05.2019 10:54:42
The Cross

The Cross

0 сообщений из 73 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

I can't type what i want. I try and type.function.png



And it wants to put the paranthesis in the wrong spot, or something else goes wrong. I got the first line correct once, with an extra tick for input, but as soon as I went to the second line, SMath took out what I typed in the first line.
#2 Опубликовано: 03.05.2019 13:05:32
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 сообщений из 6866 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

Wrote

I can't type what i want. I try and type.implicit.PNG

#3 Опубликовано: 03.05.2019 15:36:27
The Cross

The Cross

0 сообщений из 73 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

I am reading the manual. I am going through page by page. In the below, I understood everything before this point, but I cannot type what the example says:example.png

what comes out, no matter what I type is solve(x-1):=. I can't figure our how to put anything else in the parentheses.
#4 Опубликовано: 03.05.2019 18:04:33
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 сообщений из 6866 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

Wrote

what comes out, no matter what I type is solve(x-1):=. I can't figure our how to put anything else in the parentheses.


Open a new document to clear previous possible "shadow in context".
solve(2), solve(4) from f(x) menu ... click.

Britt.PNG
#5 Опубликовано: 03.05.2019 19:11:04
Alvaro Diaz Falconi

Alvaro Diaz Falconi

992 сообщений из 1674 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

Wrote

...
what comes out, no matter what I type is solve(x-1):=. I can't figure our how to put anything else in the parentheses.



Hi. Isn't "solve(...):=". It is "solve(...)=". Also, if you can't type "solve(x-1,x)=" try "solve(x-1;x)=" Maybe your list separator is ";" instead ",".

Best regards.
Alvaro.
#6 Опубликовано: 07.05.2019 09:58:26
The Cross

The Cross

0 сообщений из 73 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

Wrote

Wrote

...
what comes out, no matter what I type is solve(x-1):=. I can't figure our how to put anything else in the parentheses.



Hi. Isn't "solve(...):=". It is "solve(...)=". Also, if you can't type "solve(x-1,x)=" try "solve(x-1;x)=" Maybe your list separator is ";" instead ",".

Best regards.
Alvaro.



Sorry. You didn't understand what I said. If I type anything in that format, SMath automatically puts in the ":" I type "solve(...)=" with the keys, but SMath forces it to come out as "solve(...):="
#7 Опубликовано: 07.05.2019 10:30:20
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 сообщений из 6866 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

Wrote

Sorry. You didn't understand what I said. If I type anything in that format, SMath automatically puts in the ":" I type "solve(...)=" with the keys, but SMath forces it to come out as "solve(...):="


Maybe it's time to read more the Smath user guide book,
as well as get a keyboard that works to reproduce the examples.
solve(2) from the f(x) menu ... just click and fill-in.

SolveBritt.PNG

#8 Опубликовано: 07.05.2019 10:49:16
The Cross

The Cross

0 сообщений из 73 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

Wrote

Wrote

Sorry. You didn't understand what I said. If I type anything in that format, SMath automatically puts in the ":" I type "solve(...)=" with the keys, but SMath forces it to come out as "solve(...):="


Maybe it's time to read more the Smath user guide book,
as well as get a keyboard that works to reproduce the examples.
solve(2) from the f(x) menu ... just click and fill-in.

SolveBritt.PNG



Not sure you read everything. I will try and explain better. I am on page 38 of the "introduction to SMath manual" and am going through it page by page. I got to page 38 and tried to type the "solve" function and the above is the problem I am having. I was trying to type and learn from the example. I understood everything before that point, and everything else is working. What I am trying to type is right from the SMath manual. I attached the file in a post above from 4 days ago. It says "Examples using both symbolic and numeric results are shown below." You say use the solve(2) function. The example does not mention that function. Do I need that function for this example?
#9 Опубликовано: 07.05.2019 11:08:10
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 сообщений из 6866 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

Wrote

solve(2) from the f(x) menu ... just click and fill-in.


Do you have the f(x) in the top menu bar ?
Click f(x) ... scroll down to see solve(2)
If so go by the example ... at least try.
#10 Опубликовано: 07.05.2019 11:34:52
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 сообщений из 6866 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

Wrote

The example does not mention that function. Do I need that function for this example?


For sure you need that function !
Go again this example.

SolveAgain.PNG

#11 Опубликовано: 07.05.2019 15:07:58
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 сообщений из 6866 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

type
solve left parentheses ...
cursor in parentheses then coma coma coma

solve.PNG
#12 Опубликовано: 25.05.2019 15:04:12
mgklein

mgklein

0 сообщений из 10 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

Wrote



Not sure you read everything. I will try and explain better. I am on page 38 of the "introduction to SMath manual" and am going through it page by page. I got to page 38 and tried to type the "solve" function and the above is the problem I am having. I was trying to type and learn from the example. I understood everything before that point, and everything else is working. What I am trying to type is right from the SMath manual. I attached the file in a post above from 4 days ago. It says "Examples using both symbolic and numeric results are shown below." You say use the solve(2) function. The example does not mention that function. Do I need that function for this example?




I think what Britt1 is trying to ask is about the argument in the solve(2) and solve(4) function. The equal sign "=" inside the argument is a boolean. So, you'll need to use "Ctrl+=" to solve this problem.

I was having some issues in other equations with the same problem, but now it's kind of working. Depends on the equation and mainly the syntax.
  • Новые сообщения Новые сообщения
  • Нет новых сообщений Нет новых сообщений