Evaluate expression for a variable(s) set to a number

Evaluate expression for a variable(s) set to a number - Messages

#1 Posted: 4/10/2014 4:26:17 PM
Alexander O. Melnik

Alexander O. Melnik

127 likes in 498 posts.

Group: Moderator

Hi All,

So I am using Smath Studio for personal projects (I am converting from Mathematica that I no longer have access to).

Here is a very simple task i need to do and yet after 30 minutes of search I still do not know how to achieve it:

Say I have g=h+j-k+100

How do I evaluate g for h = 1, j=2, k=3?

I have found that if g=j+2, setting g(j)=g will do the trick for one variable only: g(1)=3, while g=j+2.

In mathematica it would be as simple as g/.{h->1,j->2,k->3}

This would come in very useful if you would want to evaluate function that has more than one variable.

Many thanks!
#2 Posted: 4/10/2014 5:46:56 PM
Alexander O. Melnik

Alexander O. Melnik

127 likes in 498 posts.

Group: Moderator

Thank you ioan92! That is really what I needed.

Also what would be the best tutorial you can recommend on SMATH? Either English or Russian.

Thanks!
#3 Posted: 4/10/2014 5:49:40 PM
Martin Kraska

Martin Kraska

1,332 likes in 2,240 posts.

Group: Moderator

The FunctionsExtensions plugin provides the at() substitution function with special operator formatting. This exploits the symbolic storage of the expression in the variable g.
at2.PNG
Technische Mechanik mit SMath Studio: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-658-50592-9
#4 Posted: 4/10/2014 5:54:11 PM
Alexander O. Melnik

Alexander O. Melnik

127 likes in 498 posts.

Group: Moderator

That looks very interesting as well, will experiment. Thanks!
#5 Posted: 4/17/2014 10:36:20 AM
Alexander O. Melnik

Alexander O. Melnik

127 likes in 498 posts.

Group: Moderator

Hi everyone!,

Not sure if this would be a bug but at() function does not seem to work while evaluating fuctions that include Min() or Max().

See workbook and photo attached.

Thanks!
sm1.png
2 users liked this post
Martin Kraska 4/17/2014 6:08:00 PM, Davide Carpi 4/19/2014 3:42:00 AM
#6 Posted: 4/17/2014 11:10:56 AM
Martin Kraska

Martin Kraska

1,332 likes in 2,240 posts.

Group: Moderator

Confirmed. This is bug of Min() and Max(). Apparently they always try to return a numeric result, regardles of what the optimization setting is. If they would return themselves with evaluated/preprocessed arguments, at() would work, as the example with max() shows.

max.PNG
Technische Mechanik mit SMath Studio: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-658-50592-9
1 users liked this post
Davide Carpi 4/17/2014 1:49:00 PM
#7 Posted: 4/17/2014 1:49:34 PM
Davide Carpi

Davide Carpi

1,436 likes in 2,915 posts.

Group: Moderator

Thanks, added in BTS: SS-114.


Best regards,

Davide
If you like my plugins please consider to support the program buying a license; for personal contributions to me: paypal.me/dcprojects
1 users liked this post
Martin Kraska 4/17/2014 6:08:00 PM
#8 Posted: 12/2/2014 7:49:20 AM
Davide Carpi

Davide Carpi

1,436 likes in 2,915 posts.

Group: Moderator

If you like my plugins please consider to support the program buying a license; for personal contributions to me: paypal.me/dcprojects
  • New Posts
  • No New Posts