1 Pages (7 items)
plot of integral - Messages
#1 Posted: 10/20/2015 5:41:02 AM
Is it possible to plot integral (as function)?
for examlpe
T(x):int(p(xx),xx,0,x)
I changed the function T(x) to matrix with X,Y coordinates, and only the matrix i can plot.
Thak's Olik
for examlpe
T(x):int(p(xx),xx,0,x)
I changed the function T(x) to matrix with X,Y coordinates, and only the matrix i can plot.
Thak's Olik
#2 Posted: 10/20/2015 6:47:54 AM
#3 Posted: 10/20/2015 7:14:58 AM
WroteHello olik,
P.S. this post iis in the wrong section
Moved to "Questions"
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"
2 users liked this post
#4 Posted: 10/21/2015 8:08:14 AM
Hello.
Thank you. That is great.
However I do not understand the form of function p(xx).
In my opinion there should be
_ _ or a function of x __ p(x) := x-2
_ _ or a function of xx _ p(xx):= xx-2
_ _ ... These options do not work.
And the function p(xx) defined with xx and without x:
- works for plot
_ _ _ _[ plot p(x) does the same as plot x-2 ]
- does not work for evaluating
_ _ _ _[ p(2)= ... "x not defined" ]
Please, can you explain me this?
Thanks Olik
Thank you. That is great.
However I do not understand the form of function p(xx).
In my opinion there should be
_ _ or a function of x __ p(x) := x-2
_ _ or a function of xx _ p(xx):= xx-2
_ _ ... These options do not work.
And the function p(xx) defined with xx and without x:
- works for plot
_ _ _ _[ plot p(x) does the same as plot x-2 ]
- does not work for evaluating
_ _ _ _[ p(2)= ... "x not defined" ]
Please, can you explain me this?
Thanks Olik
#6 Posted: 10/21/2015 1:22:00 PM
"However I do not understand the form of function p(xx)." [Olik]
_____________________________
Like you say: confusing when not used.
The beauty of Smath is like Mathcad [Mathcad being the closest to Smath]
They are both numerical executors and algorithmic evaluators.
Visit "Samples" in few minutes, I will attach an old work sheet that
clarifies/disambigutes the algorithmic construction.
Jean
_____________________________
Like you say: confusing when not used.
The beauty of Smath is like Mathcad [Mathcad being the closest to Smath]
They are both numerical executors and algorithmic evaluators.
Visit "Samples" in few minutes, I will attach an old work sheet that
clarifies/disambigutes the algorithmic construction.
Jean
1 users liked this post
ioan92 10/21/2015 1:28:00 PM
#7 Posted: 10/21/2015 1:47:20 PM
... I have added the successive drivatives from algorithmic construction
Revisit "Samples"
Jean
Revisit "Samples"
Jean
1 Pages (7 items)
-
New Posts
-
No New Posts