1 Pages (7 items)
    
plot of integral - Messages
                #1 Posted: 10/20/2015 5:41:02 AM
            
        Is it possible to plot integral (as function)?
for examlpe
T(x):int(p(xx),xx,0,x)
I changed the function T(x) to matrix with X,Y coordinates, and only the matrix i can plot.
Thak's Olik
  
            for examlpe
T(x):int(p(xx),xx,0,x)
I changed the function T(x) to matrix with X,Y coordinates, and only the matrix i can plot.
Thak's Olik
                #2 Posted: 10/20/2015 6:47:54 AM
            
        
                #3 Posted: 10/20/2015 7:14:58 AM
            
        WroteHello olik,
P.S. this post iis in the wrong section
Moved to "Questions"
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"
2 users liked this post
                #4 Posted: 10/21/2015 8:08:14 AM
            
        Hello.
Thank you. That is great.
However I do not understand the form of function p(xx).
In my opinion there should be
_ _ or a function of x __ p(x) := x-2
_ _ or a function of xx _ p(xx):= xx-2
_ _ ... These options do not work.
And the function p(xx) defined with xx and without x:
- works for plot
_ _ _ _[ plot p(x) does the same as plot x-2 ]
- does not work for evaluating
_ _ _ _[ p(2)= ... "x not defined" ]
Please, can you explain me this?
Thanks Olik
            Thank you. That is great.
However I do not understand the form of function p(xx).
In my opinion there should be
_ _ or a function of x __ p(x) := x-2
_ _ or a function of xx _ p(xx):= xx-2
_ _ ... These options do not work.
And the function p(xx) defined with xx and without x:
- works for plot
_ _ _ _[ plot p(x) does the same as plot x-2 ]
- does not work for evaluating
_ _ _ _[ p(2)= ... "x not defined" ]
Please, can you explain me this?
Thanks Olik
                #6 Posted: 10/21/2015 1:22:00 PM
            
        "However I do not understand the form of function p(xx)." [Olik]
_____________________________
Like you say: confusing when not used.
The beauty of Smath is like Mathcad [Mathcad being the closest to Smath]
They are both numerical executors and algorithmic evaluators.
Visit "Samples" in few minutes, I will attach an old work sheet that
clarifies/disambigutes the algorithmic construction.
Jean
            _____________________________
Like you say: confusing when not used.
The beauty of Smath is like Mathcad [Mathcad being the closest to Smath]
They are both numerical executors and algorithmic evaluators.
Visit "Samples" in few minutes, I will attach an old work sheet that
clarifies/disambigutes the algorithmic construction.
Jean
1 users liked this post
ioan92 10/21/2015 1:28:00 PM
                #7 Posted: 10/21/2015 1:47:20 PM
            
        ... I have added the successive drivatives from algorithmic construction
Revisit "Samples"
Jean
            Revisit "Samples"
Jean
        1 Pages (7 items)
    
- New Posts
- No New Posts
 
                ![2015-10-21 13_29_22-SMath Studio Desktop - [Page1.sm_].png](/en-US/files/Download/x7ABQP/2015-10-21-13_29_22-SMath-Studio-Desktop---[Page1.sm_].png)
![2015-10-21 13_29_22-SMath Studio Desktop - [Page1.sm_].png](/en-US/files/Download/PbbVHN/2015-10-21-13_29_22-SMath-Studio-Desktop---[Page1.sm_].png)