Simpson Richardson

Simpson Richardson - Simpson Richardson - Messages

#1 Posted: 10/31/2016 12:53:52 AM
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 likes in 6866 posts.

Group: User

1. Needs be compacted in function form.
2. Very poor integrator. Hardly improves Smath operator.
3. Slow to useless.
4. I don't understand (dint-dintp)/15 ?
...Why not 15.1234567890987654321helloGrandma
5. exp(sqrt(x)) was chosen for it's innocent look
but difficult to integrate c/w sanity check.
6. Observe Romberg [f, limits] => for high accuracy.

Jean

Integrate SimpsonRichardson.sm (25 KiB) downloaded 40 time(s).

Needs a proof of utility by application.
#2 Posted: 10/31/2016 6:38:30 AM
Radovan Omorjan

Radovan Omorjan

325 likes in 2052 posts.

Group: Moderator

Simpson-Richardson is not a good choice.

I think this is SMath file I made long time ago (not sure). I was just playing with it.

Regards,
Radovan
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"
  • New Posts New Posts
  • No New Posts No New Posts