Simpson Richardson

Simpson Richardson - Simpson Richardson - Сообщения

#1 Опубликовано: 31.10.2016 00:53:52
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 сообщений из 6866 понравились пользователям.

Группа: User

1. Needs be compacted in function form.
2. Very poor integrator. Hardly improves Smath operator.
3. Slow to useless.
4. I don't understand (dint-dintp)/15 ?
...Why not 15.1234567890987654321helloGrandma
5. exp(sqrt(x)) was chosen for it's innocent look
but difficult to integrate c/w sanity check.
6. Observe Romberg [f, limits] => for high accuracy.

Jean

Integrate SimpsonRichardson.sm (25 КиБ) скачан 38 раз(а).

Needs a proof of utility by application.
#2 Опубликовано: 31.10.2016 06:38:30
Radovan Omorjan

Radovan Omorjan

325 сообщений из 2052 понравились пользователям.

Группа: Moderator

Simpson-Richardson is not a good choice.

I think this is SMath file I made long time ago (not sure). I was just playing with it.

Regards,
Radovan
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"
  • Новые сообщения Новые сообщения
  • Нет новых сообщений Нет новых сообщений