2D Plot Vectorised vector - Not sure this is possible - Сообщения
#21 Опубликовано: 21.01.2021 13:02:40
Not sure why you cannot open.
It is a persisting random bug, from unknown.
Windows not recognizing *.sm format, at random and why.
That bug has not been isolated ... Russian Roulette ?
#22 Опубликовано: 22.01.2021 04:09:05
...
A good way is to work units-less, then append silent units.
Calculation without units. Units are presented at the end of the calculation
Heate.sm
#23 Опубликовано: 22.01.2021 11:28:29
Ber7,
Still off by a factor of units (12 to convert inches to ft). I split this to a NEW TOPIC. I've never used the Mat2System function.
Still off by a factor of units (12 to convert inches to ft). I split this to a NEW TOPIC. I've never used the Mat2System function.
#24 Опубликовано: 22.01.2021 11:46:23
#25 Опубликовано: 22.01.2021 11:49:28
#26 Опубликовано: 22.01.2021 12:05:10
#27 Опубликовано: 22.01.2021 12:08:24
That's the problem. Units are important and impact the way the function is not working. Divide t by 12 and the The x column no longer starts with 4, but 1/3 and the y column is correct. Leave it as is and the x column is correct and the y column is wrong.
#28 Опубликовано: 22.01.2021 13:09:45
That's the problem. Units are important and impact the way the function is not working. Divide t by 12 and the The x column no longer starts with 4, but 1/3 and the y column is correct. Leave it as is and the x column is correct and the y column is wrong.
I love Ber7 method, saved it personal.
Easy to scale/reconciliate from your original by 'λ'
Unit Waterloo Otherwise.sm
#29 Опубликовано: 22.01.2021 13:27:55
In dimension Ro there is a ft. Therefore, the size t
should be expressed in ft. The bug has been fixed.
Heate in-ft.sm
should be expressed in ft. The bug has been fixed.
Heate in-ft.sm
#30 Опубликовано: 22.01.2021 14:34:41
In dimension Ro there is a ft.
Therefore, the size tshould be expressed in ft.
The bug has been fixed.
Wait and watch what Elsid will comment !
Units system is really a Monkey Business, isn't ?
#31 Опубликовано: 22.01.2021 14:49:53
In dimension Ro there is a ft. Therefore, the size t
should be expressed in ft. The bug has been fixed.
Correct, divide by 12 ... in this case.
This elegant function appears to work on all empirical equations, as long as the user input units are double checks for consistent cancellation.
Is the descriptor of the function accurate? Heat Capacity Function_Sys2Mat Ber7.sm
#32 Опубликовано: 23.01.2021 14:51:29
Change your file a bit and added clarifications
Heat t Ber7.sm
Heat t Ber7.sm
1 пользователям понравился этот пост
ElSid 23.01.2021 19:07:00
-
Новые сообщения
-
Нет новых сообщений