SMath Studio 0.98.5990 (26 May 2016) - Сообщения
#1 Опубликовано: 26.05.2016 18:54:20
SMath Studio 0.98.5990 available
Latest changes (against SMath Studio 0.98.5983)
- SS-2301: Symbol 'i' can now be used as a function argument;
- Function eval() improved to allow calculation of the functions inside definition even if function's arguments are undefined;
- SS-2352: Pressing Insert Matrix button when part of expression is selected fixed;
- SS-2349: Line breaks incorrectly shown in Dynamic Assistance;
- SS-2351: IsDefined() function fixed for infinity and infinity now exists in Autocompletion list;
- SS-2348: Crash on deleting result of calculation fixed;
- Support for numbers started with decimal symbol improved inside MathRegion;
- Calculation logic refactoring.
Download
- Desktop Windows (desktop computer with Windows OS):
SMathStudioDesktop.0_98_5990.Setup.msi (Date: 26.05.2016. File size: 2.02MB) - Desktop Linux (desktop computer with Linux OS):
SMathStudioDesktop.0_98_5990.Mono.tar.gz (Date: 26.05.2016. File size: 1.16MB) - last version of Mono distributive required! - Cloud version (all modern browsers supported):
SMath Studio in the Cloud (Date: 26.05.2016.)
5 пользователям понравился этот пост
Mike Kaganski 26.05.2016 19:09:00, Davide Carpi 26.05.2016 19:47:00, NDTM Amarasekera 26.05.2016 23:41:00, Radovan Omorjan 27.05.2016 06:33:00, sergio 27.05.2016 11:51:00
#2 Опубликовано: 26.05.2016 19:09:56
I suppose it's 5990, not 5983 
Thanks for great news!
Thanks for great news!
С уважением,
Михаил Каганский
#3 Опубликовано: 26.05.2016 19:46:33
I suppose it's 5990, not 5983
Thanks for great news!
You're right
Thank you!
#4 Опубликовано: 26.05.2016 23:22:43
С уважением,
Михаил Каганский
#5 Опубликовано: 27.05.2016 10:58:52
Hi Andrey,
It looks like maple plugin has a problem with 5990.
All my valuable symbolic calculations are broken.
For me, the last good version is 5973.
Please look what is wrong with this sample.
This time, it doesn't report x-not defined, but hangs forever ...
Thanks,
Igor
cic3-1.sm
It looks like maple plugin has a problem with 5990.
All my valuable symbolic calculations are broken.
For me, the last good version is 5973.
Please look what is wrong with this sample.
This time, it doesn't report x-not defined, but hangs forever ...
Thanks,
Igor
cic3-1.sm
#6 Опубликовано: 27.05.2016 11:32:45
I guess maple() function must be recompiled following this hint. Please be patient, it is a change that affects all the functions that deals with symbolic data.
If you like my plugins please consider to support the program buying a license; for personal contributions to me: paypal.me/dcprojects
#7 Опубликовано: 01.06.2016 16:02:08
I found a bug in this version. Took over 5 minutes before I terminated the file. I took a snapshot with the timer running (shows 43 seconds) after Jean confirmed 5 seconds on his machine using version 5346.
Is this supposed to take over 5 minutes to calculate? May be SMath as this is the second sheet today that "locks-up" with the calculation tool bas and the timer running
Re-download in case something got wrong in the transmission.
XP Home, 1.8 GHz, Smath 5346 OFFicial release => 5 seconds
Jean
Inst_Viscosity Water.sm
Would be interesting more collabs test the timing, thanks.
#8 Опубликовано: 01.06.2016 18:14:40
С уважением,
Михаил Каганский
#9 Опубликовано: 02.06.2016 13:35:56
Mike,
Still seems like a computational bug. Mine went 5 minutes before I closed it down
Still seems like a computational bug. Mine went 5 minutes before I closed it down
Re-download in case something got wrong in the transmission.
XP Home, 1.8 GHz, Smath 5346 OFFicial release => 5 seconds
Jean
#10 Опубликовано: 02.06.2016 19:37:47
Mike,
Still seems like a computational bug. Mine went 5 minutes before I closed it down
Yes, but is this truly SMath bug? Or some extension's? Did you try to investigate before writing "I found a bug" to the New Smath Version advertisement topic?
I have no maple/maxima on my system, could that be a thing?
С уважением,
Михаил Каганский
#11 Опубликовано: 02.06.2016 22:24:20
Yes, but is this truly SMath bug? Or some extension's? Did you try to investigate before writing "I found a bug" to the New Smath Version advertisement topic?
I have no maple/maxima on my system, could that be a thing?
======================= I read you Mike ===========================
1. It may be a problem with local machine/OS ... conflict with others [I doubt].
2. Maybe with the Maxima solve block: solve(μT(t)-q(t),t,2,30) => disable the solve block.
3. Maple is not invoked in this attached document => eliminate Maple
4. With the symbolic Ah ! but only Smath symbolic.
-------- Thiele continued fraction Smath symbolic down to the plot => 4.5 sec
-------- Thiele continued fraction Smath numeric down to the plot => 0.5 sec
A thiele continued fraction calculates bottom to top [24 Aops ... Arithmetic operations]
This Thiele in Smath symbolic is in the range of 8 pages wide, my count 326 Aops
The μ350(x) is a J_Fraction equivalent to the continued fraction still existing in Maple.
It reduces the Aops [in this case down from 24 to 13. It computes faster as well as reported in C.T. Fikes [IBM of years 70]. I think I still have the algorithm of J_Frac,
in case some of you developpers would be interested.
The rational fractions [typical normalised Padé style] are expandable in J_Fraction,
but here again: Smath symbolic expands in horrible mess as the continued fraction.
The Newton-Wallis method is a way to compute continued fraction top to bottom.
My brain has diluted on this, maybe Mathcad as well.
Now, whoever wants: test and report versions to versions.
Cheers, Jean
Forum Compute Test.sm
#12 Опубликовано: 02.06.2016 22:39:11
That was partial answer. I just upgraded to 5997 and there was an update to the Maple V wrapper. System went 14 seconds before I terminated it. I disabled the plugin and it took .98 rev 5997 0.760 seconds to process. Andrey fixed something in the new version as I was over 14 seconds with Maple disabled before. Sorry for not being clear before.Yes, but is this truly SMath bug? Or some extension's? Did you try to investigate before writing "I found a bug" to the New Smath Version advertisement topic?
I have no maple/maxima on my system, could that be a thing?
#13 Опубликовано: 03.06.2016 02:43:44
That was partial answer.I just upgraded to 5997 and there was an update to the Maple V wrapper.System went 14 seconds before I terminated it.I disabled the plugin and it took .98 rev 5997 0.760 seconds to process.Andrey fixed something in the new version as I was over 14 seconds with Maple disabled before.Sorry for not being clear before.
Are you talking about
Forum Compute Test.sm
This document has nothing to do with Maple. I would be damned deceived if Smath couldn't
add 2+2 by itself. It just does from Windows resources. Are you the only user of the machine ? If not: kill all the birds around. In the attached work sheet, there are two
timing. So, which one are you talking about ?
Cheers, Jean.
#14 Опубликовано: 03.06.2016 03:17:53
Oh ! there is another point, most important, like this: Some "modern users" have dual core, quadruple core.
That kills the compute engine [slows down]. There was a Mathsoft collab crying about Mathcad 11 takig minutes
to calculate a work sheet with his bomb dual core that mine, steam engine, computed in fraction of second.
That kills the compute engine [slows down]. There was a Mathsoft collab crying about Mathcad 11 takig minutes
to calculate a work sheet with his bomb dual core that mine, steam engine, computed in fraction of second.
#15 Опубликовано: 03.06.2016 11:33:41
#16 Опубликовано: 03.06.2016 13:24:41
Nope.Same file as my original post to your file
Elsid: please, recycle "Your file"
download the one "Forum, Compute test"
Jean
-
Новые сообщения
-
Нет новых сообщений