How to write a over dot & double subscript levels? - Сообщения
#1 Опубликовано: 19.07.2016 06:11:30
Hi,
i have to questions at the moment:
-is it possible to write a overdot like for the volumetric flow rate?
-how could i write double subscripts?
e.g.:
Many thanks in advance!
i have to questions at the moment:
-is it possible to write a overdot like for the volumetric flow rate?
-how could i write double subscripts?
e.g.:
Many thanks in advance!
#2 Опубликовано: 19.07.2016 06:54:08
Hello Topaz,
I have no answer to your first question - I don't know.
Maybe another user has a solution for that.
To your second question:
as far as I know (and use), you can only write one (1) subscript, but you can than add an index number with the "[" key.
in fact you define a vector.
see the attached file
kind regards,
csb
I have no answer to your first question - I don't know.
Maybe another user has a solution for that.
To your second question:
as far as I know (and use), you can only write one (1) subscript, but you can than add an index number with the "[" key.
in fact you define a vector.
see the attached file
kind regards,
csb
#3 Опубликовано: 19.07.2016 09:43:58
In maths works ang Engineering works, subscripts are confusing.
To me: completely useless, never use. Occasionaly, as short
description is usefull to evidence the RHS construction.
Further, Smath is very limited in the ASCII 'Alt+0key'. Probably
because of the so many languages it was designed to accomodate.
NONE of my Smath Engineering work sheet contains subscript.
Jean
Inst_Colebrook Pipe Data.sm
Inst_Orifice Plate.sm
To me: completely useless, never use. Occasionaly, as short
description is usefull to evidence the RHS construction.
Further, Smath is very limited in the ASCII 'Alt+0key'. Probably
because of the so many languages it was designed to accomodate.
NONE of my Smath Engineering work sheet contains subscript.
Jean
Inst_Colebrook Pipe Data.sm
Inst_Orifice Plate.sm
#4 Опубликовано: 19.07.2016 09:55:34
@ Topaz
As you can see in the reply from Jean, you can use - as a workaround - the underscore in the subscript:
Hope this works for you.
Regards, csb
As you can see in the reply from Jean, you can use - as a workaround - the underscore in the subscript:
Hope this works for you.
Regards, csb
#5 Опубликовано: 19.07.2016 15:52:35
Yes, csb531: underscore is a variable name by itself,
like this ... _(x):=sin(x)
or as a "union/separator" in variable name definition
as well as "union/separator" in subscripted text.
Jean
like this ... _(x):=sin(x)
or as a "union/separator" in variable name definition
as well as "union/separator" in subscripted text.
Jean
-
Новые сообщения
-
Нет новых сообщений